Here I Stand

Here I Stand

Friday, June 1, 2012

Ramon Allones Robusto



Ramon Allones Robusto

Due to the efforts of a good friend, I had the privilege of smoking a Ramon Allones Robusto last week. I am familiar with Cuban Cigars, but this will be the first review I have posted of a Cuban. I tend to stay away from these types of posts (unlike Cigar Aficionado) because I often feel it is rude to show off wares and products that are inaccessible to most. Something of a “Look what I have that you can't get” type of situation. That being said, these particular cigars were a gift, and out of professional courtesy, and due to requests for more reviews, I bring you: The Ramon Allones Robusto, Hecho a Mano en Habana, Cuba

Pre-light aroma of fine leather and spice. It has a good firm feel and slightly oily texture – which I like, though some may not. It lit easily, with a smooth, easy draw. There was a good volume of soft, velvety smoke right as it opened up. The first third of this puro was excellent, with floral notes and a sweet flavor of honey. This led to a more robust middle section where the stronger tastes of leather, oak, and bourbon. These flavors finished off the cigar, but became ever more pronounced as I continued to draw. The construction, as to be expected from a Cuban masterpiece, was excellent, while the burn was even and clean. The ash was stiff, white, and firm. Even the winds of Newport Harbor had a hard time blowing the cherry off this cigar.

The Ramon Allones was a real treat to smoke, and I am glad to have a few resting in my humidor for future consumption. I am most impressed, however, at the similarities and confidence in construction and flavor that have been exhibited by many of my favorite Honduran and Dominican brands. There are still subtle differences, of course, and half of the pleasure of partaking in a Cuban cigar is knowing that it is, indeed a Cuban, crafted by the undisputed master tobacconists of the world. The cigar industry, though, has evolved to the level that craftsmen, many of then trained in Cuba or from the Cuban tradition, are rising to the times, and the gap in quality and flavor between Cuban cigars, and those of the free world, is shrinking with every crop of tobacco grown.

Monday, May 28, 2012

Memorial Day


Memorial Day:

I don’t want to be the typical, token, disgruntled veteran complaining about how Memorial Day is too much about BBQ’s, the beginning of summer, and having Monday off from work. Judging by the two wars we have been fighting the last decade, and if your Facebook newsfeed is anything like mine, then you have noticed that the true meaning of Memorial Day is at the forefront of the minds of much of the country.

Even here in Newport Beach – a haven for both the out of touch bourgeois rich and the naïve, left leaning hipster culture, there are flags proudly displayed, and lunch specials at corner coffee shops offering a free cup of Joe to service-members (shout out to My Galley Café at 5th street and Balboa – Thanks for the Coffee!) The meaning of the holiday has not been forgotten, it is pounded into us through social media and peer pressure, and many times it feels forced. It’s like saying thank you to Grandma for that hideous sweater on Christmas, or sending a halfhearted gift for that wedding invitation you got from a guy you haven’t seen since high school, and barely knew back then. It is an obligation. It is something we don’t really want to do, but feel bad if we don’t. Those serving in the military make up less than 1% of the population, and true enough, to actually meet a soldier outside of a military town is something of a surprise to many. The wars are half a world away: something you hear about on the news, but that rarely comes into casual conversation (as opposed to say, WWII, where for four years the entire country was tirelessly devoted to the defeat of the Axis Powers.) Everyone has a cousin in the navy (they think…) or has an uncle who fought in Vietnam, or knows a guy from high school who joined the Army when he didn’t get that football scholarship he wanted, but how many of your average citizens actually know someone who was killed in action? The answer is precious few – make no mistake, I hold nothing against the community at large for being kept away from the horrors of war. For the most part, those affected by the cost of American freedom are a warrior caste. We are set apart from the population, willingly confined to military posts and duty stations, occasionally venturing out for Christmas leave or a long weekend. We associate almost exclusively with other soldiers. Many were born to military families, and knew from an early age that they were destined for the profession of arms. It is a point of pride that we bear the burden of our society’s comfort. But even then there is a lot that gets lost in the actual application of that concept.

The men that I served beside did not fight for oil, or land, or riches, or even for freedom, or to keep the country safe. We all have personal reasons for joining up, but no matter what those are; we do what we do for those beside us. We do it for personal pride, for honor – in whatever personal definition that word holds for the individual. We don’t strap on body armor and seek out the enemy for barbeques or shopping malls or the free market or apple pie. Those are some pretty awesome byproducts of our actions, but we do it because it is expected of us. I did it because I didn’t want men like Tony DePetris, Matt Hermanson, Nate Henry, or Brian Knapp to have to face whatever lay outside the wire without me.

The men I know who fell in battle are too many to name. That is what comes with spending most of your adult life as a soldier. It is a small Army out there, and there is never a time when I am not scanning the news after some tragic story, searching for the name of a comrade. There are times when I hate myself for being stateside while I have friends that are still fighting. These are things that I don’t expect the average American to understand – no service member expects them to. We are a warrior caste so that they do not have to understand them. There is more of a burden to defending the nation than physical scars, but we don’t need pity. There is pride that comes with the job, and when you live a Spartan lifestyle of service to the nation, then pride is often all that you have. Don’t take that away with some abstract sense of guilt or false gratitude. Enjoy your Barbeque. Have fun at the beach on your day off. Our freedom to do so is through of the efforts of the military, so why waste this gift paid for by blood and sweat, toil and chaos! We make these sacrifices specifically so the people of the United States can remain blissfully ignorant of the costs of war. The only thanks that we really crave is from those beside us: a nod of approval from a brother in arms, a pat on the back (literal, not figurative) after a rough day, or a shared drink after a shared hardship.

It is important to remember Memorial Day for the somber day that it is, but do not let guilt or sadness or even gratitude erase the freedoms that their sacrifices bought. Have your moment of silence, fly your flag, and raise your glass to the memory of the men and women you never knew, but also honor them with smiles, laughter, and time with your loved ones.

Dedicated to: Matthew Hermanson, Benjamin Britt, Tom Martin, Nick Dewhirst, Neale Shank, Tim Cunningham, Emily Perez, Jacob Harrelson, Brian Mack, and a host of others who stood beside me and were carried home on their shields.

Friday, May 18, 2012

Facebook IPO

Facebook IPO


So if you pay attention to financial news – or really the news at all – there has been one major theme that has dominated the headlines this last week: the Facebook IPO. The already fabulously wealthy founders of the wildly popular social media site are set to become multi-billionaires. And why shouldn't they? Mark Zuckerberg and crew have quite literally changed the world as we know it. Where Myspace and Friendster came before, Facebook has united what was once a fringe, hipster culture, into not only the mainstream, but into everyday life. I don't know anyone who doesn't check their Facebook page at least a few times a day. Most do it on their phone when they have 30 seconds of downtime. It has millions of users, and is probably the single most visited website on the internet. Think about it. Everyone has their own preference for news sites, movie sites, professional sites, etc. and this divides the audience. Facebook, however, is a global hegemon and not just in the social media field, but in the world.


And as of today, you can own a piece of this hegemon. Facebook is having it's Initial Public Offering (or IPO) as I write this, and you too can capitalize on the all encompassing powerhouse that is the social network. This question is, though, would you want to? There is no question as to the brilliance of Zuckerberg's creation, and getting in on the ground level would have been a life changing experience. But has the media giant run its course? They were asking $38 a share for their IPO, and last I checked, they were selling for right at $41. This is an excellent margin for their first day of trading, and Zuckerberg should rightly be excited about this successful IPO, but honestly, I am not sure where Facebook will go from here.


Facebook is not Apple – who has stunned the world with constant innovation and new invention, shaping society with their ever changing line of products. Their stock price went from somewhere in the $30's to over $300 in just a few years. Facebook, for all the changes that they make to their layout, does not produce... well, anything. Yes, they provide an audience to market to, and have done an excellent job tailoring their ads to what their readers want to see, but have you ever clicked on a link? Sure, I read shares, and go through articles, and get really involved in my social networking from time to time, but I don't think I have ever bought something because I saw an ad on Facebook. Company's are starting to realize this. Earlier this week GM pulled all of its ads, saying that it just wasn't seeing results. I see facebook as being an excellent tool for niche brands and specific products – using their trageting dynamic to tailor the market that sees their ads to exactly the people they want to sell to, but national brands and general products? Not so much. Everyone knows about the Chevy Cruze... and sure, maybe someone who has pictures of trees and birds on their page would like to hear about the eco properties that the car offers, but they might not base a $30,000 decision on an ad in a margin.


Do Zuckerberg and the team at facebook have the knowledge and skill to change this? To morph into a marketing scheme with Pintrest level devotion to products? Yes, they certainly do! Will they do it? I don't know. I anticipate Facebook having an excellent IPO, maybe topping out as high as $45, but hitting a plateau almost immediately afterward. There will be a lucky few – typically the high end mutual funds and market managers who are invited to such high profile bids – who will make a killing off of Facebook, and with a shift in their innovation (not, by any means, a given) I could see it being a decent long term investment (5-10 years) and probably beating inflation in terms of appreciation, but if you can't buy it now, I wouldn't buy it next week. It's not going anywhere for a while, and there are better opportunities out there.

Friday, May 11, 2012

Changes

There is a lot going on for me these days, with exams, drill, work and summer opportunities all coming to a head, so I have been a bit remiss in posting as of late. Rest assured that there are still thing's going on and you will hear about them shortly.  I was a guest instructor at a tactical carbine course,  I went to a couple of really great cigar events, our Charlie Sheen issue is coming out, and I have a few more reviews that I'm going over as well. You will get the details on all of it soon.


You will also start seeing changes to the format and tone of my articles. Also some changes in the setup, template, and color scheme. Less militaristic, less of a rant. More informative. I hope the change will be for the better as I am looking for that last push to get me over 30K hits.


Also, if anyone who reads this has anything that they would like to read about or get some insight on, please feel free to leave a comment and I will try to help out. Fashion, finance, business, cigars, liquor, weapons,  tactics, culture,  even politics to some extent.


Well, I am writing this via Blogger fr android on my phone, while sitting onva bus on my way up to Camp San Luis Obispo for drill, so I will wrap this latest entry up, but not before I try and upload a photo via my mobile device. That's a button down spread collar from Hugo Boss. Enjoy!


Published with Blogger-droid v2.0.4

Tuesday, May 1, 2012

May Day!

Happy May Day everyone! Oh, you don't celebrate May Day? Good for you! That's likely because you're not a disillusioned ,ignorant, communist hippie, and I applaud your decision to be a productive member of society!


If you do celebrate May Day, then that is your choice, and a right guaranteed to you by the US Constitution, the very concept you wish to supplant, and the document that I and my brothers and sisters in arms have fought to uphold and defend. I don't agree with what you have to say, but I will defend your right to say it!


So don't forget to wear red and have a parade no one cares about, because seriously, no beads or moonpies? What was Stalin thinking?


Published with Blogger-droid v2.0.4

Friday, April 27, 2012

Fashionable Concealed Carry

Read this article on CNBC of all places. Fashionable concealed carry attire has been a long time coming, and I am glad to see it getting a bit of design attention. Woolrich is not exactly Armani, but for the moment, it will do. I am not altogether in agreement with the tone of the article, making it seem as if gun owners, and those with a Concealed Carry Permit (myself included) are on the fringe of society, or are the exception to the rule. This strikes me as typical New York Times reporting (where the article originally appeared) and from an area where being an armed or self-sufficient citizen often means enduring the disdain of polite society. Here in California, where Orange County has declared that I do not have a "Pressing Need" to carry a concealed pistol, despite being a Cali DOJ certified instructor (This state has a long and storied history of preventing its citizens from defending themselves, and I have a CCW from my home state of Florida) I have a tactical folding knife and a defensive flashlight as part of my EDC (Everyday Carry) and I find myself the go-to guy when a line needs to be cut or something needs to be illuminated. I carry this even in a tailored suit (give three-piece a chance!) in whatever polite company I find myself. I dream of the day when I can get a Brooks Brothers suit with a side vent for my FNP .40 or an Armani jacket cut wide across the back for a shoulder holster. Such illustrious publications as GQ and Esquire have made it well known their sartorial disdain of those of us who carry a weapon for a living, and I find this not only sad, but offensive to the very concept I spent my life defending: The Constitution of the United States. All I can say is that when the wolf attacks, he will find that not all among the flock are sheep. Are you?

The most frustrating comment of all though, appears to be the very last. The gun owner, who works in a gun store, declares that you should dress around your gun, not to fashion. I find this idea absurd.You ought to be able to do both. Neither side in this argument seems to be able to find a middle ground - and for the "everyday man" who wears work pants and a vest around town, you're not fooling anyone. You're carrying, and anyone who matters knows it. Whats worse, is that you look like a tool, and you orient your entire life around that .45 on your hip. I look good when I carry (when I find myself in a state that allows me to) and there is more than one way to print a gun. You can do it in your style, and demeanor - which does not always deter criminals, just everyone else in your life.

Original Link: http://www.cnbc.com/id/47158181/

New Fashion Wrinkle: Stylishly Hiding the Gun

By: Matt Richtel

Woolrich, a 182-year-old clothing company, describes its new chino pants as an elegant and sturdy fashion statement, with a clean profile and fabric that provides comfort and flexibility.
And they are great for hiding a handgun.

The company has added a second pocket behind the traditional front pocket for a weapon. Or, for those who prefer to pack their gun in a holster, it can be tucked inside the stretchable waistband. The back pockets are also designed to help hide accessories, like a knife and a flashlight.

The chinos, which cost $65, are not for commandos, but rather, the company says, for the fashion-aware gun owner. And Woolrich has competition. Several clothing companies are following suit, building businesses around the sharp rise in people with permits to carry concealed weapons.

Their ranks swelled to around seven million last year from five million in 2008, partly because of changes to state laws on concealed handguns.

Shawn Thompson, 35, who works at an auto dealership in eastern Kentucky, bought two shirts last month from the Woolrich Elite Concealed Carry line. Both, he wrote on his blog, are a step up from more rugged gear.

“Most of the clothes I used in the past to hide my sidearm looked pretty sloppy and had my girlfriend complaining about my looks,” he wrote, adding in an interview, “I’m not James Bond or nothing, but these look pretty nice.”

The shirt has a barely discernible side slit with Velcro through which, he said, he can yank his Colt 1911 from his waistband holster. Depending on circumstances and mood, he might also carry a folding knife and, at night, a flashlight in a pair of Woolrich chinos his girlfriend bought for him.

Carriers of concealed guns say the new options are a departure from the law enforcement and military look, known as “tactical,” long favored by gun owners.

The latest styles, by contrast, are called “concealed carry” or “covert fashion.”

“What we’ve tried to do is create a collection of garments that allows the end user to have stylish lifestyle apparel but have features in the garment that enable them to carry a weapon and draw the weapon quickly,” said David Hagler, a vice president at 5.11 Tactical, who was lured from Nike to work at 5.11, one of the biggest makers of clothing for soldiers and police officers.

The company’s growing concealed-carry line includes a lightweight water-resistant vest coming this fall — the sort of vest that is standard and trendy at any mainstream outdoor shop but has strategic pockets for guns. It also includes a stealth compartment in front so the wearer can appear to be warming his hands while actually gripping a pistol in a waistband holster.

Other companies are rushing to meet the demand for concealed-carry clothing. Under Armour, best known for its sports and action gear, will be adding a jacket and a plaid shirt with Velcro pockets for easy gun access.

Kevin Eskridge, senior director for outdoor product and design at the company, said the company had seen demand double in the last year for such clothing from traditional outdoor and sporting goods stores, like Dick’s Sporting Goods [DKS 50.65 0.57 (+1.14%) ] and Cabela’s. [CAB 38.69 -2.11 (-5.17%) ]

Mr. Eskridge said the Under Armour [UA 97.59 0.93 (+0.96%) ] apparel was catching on because of fashion but also because of its features, including moisture-wicking fabric.

“Others are making shirts with gun access but using regular cotton,” he said. With his company’s fabrics, “there’s no stink factor,” he said. And if gun owners do not use fabrics that wick away moisture, “You’ll literally rust out,” he added.

Gun experts suggest that there are many reasons for the growth in the number of people with concealed-carry permits. They say it is partly due to a changing political and economic climate — gun owners are professing to want a feeling of control — and state laws certainly have made a difference.
After a campaign by gun rights advocates, 37 states now have “shall issue” statutes that require them to provide concealed-carry permits if an applicant meets legal requirements, like not being a felon. (A handful of other states allow the concealed carrying of handguns without a permit). By contrast, in 1984 only 8 states had such statutes, and 15 did not allow handgun carrying at all, said John Lott, a researcher of gun culture who has held teaching or research posts at a number of universities, including the University of Chicago.
Only one state, Illinois, now forbids handgun carrying in any form, but the legislature is considering a change.
A majority of states have long allowed the open carrying of handguns, said Mr. Lott, who also provided the data on gun permits. But the reality, said Mr. Lott and other gun experts, is that people do not want to show others that they are carrying a weapon or invite sharp questioning from the police.
The clothing lines address a perceived need in the concealed-carry subculture. Gun owners say they want to practice “maximum uncertainty,” meaning that if a gun is sufficiently concealed, a potential criminal will be unsure whether to attack. Gun experts say the research is inconclusive about whether such tactics reduce crime. Regardless, the clothing makers are jumping on the line of thinking.
“When someone walks down the street in a button-down and khakis, the bad guy gets a glimmer of fear, wondering: are they packing or not?” said Allen Forkner, a spokesman for Woolrich, which started its concealed-carry line in 2010 with three shirts.
The company has since added new patterns for shirts, pants and the Elite Discreet Carry Twill jacket, in dark shale gray and dark wheat tan. In addition to its gun-friendly pockets, the jacket has a channel cut through the back that the company says can be used to store plastic handcuffs.
Not everyone who carries a concealed gun is a fan of the new fashion. Howard Walter, 61, a salesman at Wade’s Eastside Guns in Bellevue, Wash., said he preferred to carry his Colt — and a couple of knives and two extra magazines — in a durable pair of work pants.
“They don’t shout ‘gun,’ they shout ‘average guy in the street,’ ” said Mr. Walter, who years ago worked in sales at Nordstrom. But really, he said, the most important thing in picking clothing is to choose something that works for the weapon. “They should dress for the gun,” he said he advised his customers. “Not for the fashion.”

Thursday, April 26, 2012

ICBSC


This past weekend was the intensive phase of the semester long International Collegiate Business Strategy Competition (ICBSC). For those that I have yet to regale with the details of this endeavor, the ICBSC is a collegiate competition at both the undergraduate and MBA level where teams of contestants create a fictional company and manage it through seven years of operations. These operations run the entire gamut of what can be expected of executive level management, from sales forecasts and production management to marketing and finance.





My company, representing Cal-State Long Beach, and manufacturing waterproof and shock proof MP3 players (For the active lifestyle that those of us in Southern California enjoy) was called “Long Beach Sound” (get it?) and I took over the reins as the CFO (Chief Financial Officer) My original goal as CFO was to finance the company through our operating income. This is a risky strategy, as it keeps us from having to pay interest, dividends, or diluting existing outstanding stock, but it also relies on current and existing cash flow in order to expand – which we did, very quickly, and very aggressively. Combine this with the company’s commitment to training and research & development, and we were cutting it close to the wire every quarter in terms of financing our operations.

Decisions were made every quarter (represented as usually once a week and gradually speeding up all the way to once every two hours during the intensive phase.) and I am proud to say that we were completely successful in being a self-sufficient company. We never had to issue bonds, or dilute our stock with a further issue, nor were we forced into emergency bank loans – known as the financial kiss of death in this competition. In fact, Long Beach Sound made a serious dent in our capital structure by buying back about 20% of our shares outstanding, and retiring much of our bond debt, therefore increasing shareholder value and overall stability, all while reinvesting in the company.


Without getting too far into the details of the competition – which may bore many readers (we joked that it was similar to the number crunching Olympics, that we were “Matheletes,” and I even referred to the competition as the Business world’s varsity dungeons & dragons team) I learned a great deal. One of the main lessons learned was that everything depends on everything else. To say business is a vicious cycle is far too cliché, but also very accurate. Finance depends on sales, which depends on production, which depends on forecasts, which depends on infrastructure, which depends on finance. Somewhere in that mix, throw in marketing, training, R&D, advertising, and oh yes, the competition. That is something else that you have to worry about. Much like the old military saying of “The plan never survives the first contact” a business plan depends largely on what your competitors do. Their price points, their capacity, their production, all have to be carefully monitored and kept in mind in order to optimize your own.


In the end, I think we performed well. Long Beach Sound placed 1st in Business Documents (Strategic Business Plan, Annual Report, 10K, etc.) and 3rd in Overall Performance. We also stood in a division that had some very stiff competition. We faced down, and ultimately outperformed such illustrious MBA programs as Purdue, and Northwestern’s Kellog School of Business. The program was a lot of work, and a good bit of fun. I am glad that I did it, and it will be a nice bullet point on my resume, but I am glad it is over. It truly was like having another job, in addition to the one I already have, my full time Grad School schedule, and my obligations to the California National Guard. If you are an MBA student or Business Undergrad then see if your school is putting together a team for next year. It will be well worth your time.